• Top Posts

  • Follow Me on Twitter

    • RT @byIanThomas: Heineken has signed a five-year renewal of its partnership with MLS, which now runs through '22. As part of the deal, Hein… 2 days ago
    • RT @byIanThomas: Breaking: MLS & Liga MX sign new long-term & wide ranging partnership that will oversee the launch of several new initiati… 1 week ago
    • RT @alexeheath: Here's my full interview with Twitter VP of Content Partnerships @kaymadati on the company's recent MLS deal, how Twitter v… 1 week ago
    • RT @DougRobersonAJC: Oddly, Atlanta delivered a 2.0 rating for #atlutd game. It was the 3rd-highest local market behind Louisville 2.7 rati… 1 week ago
    • RT @TheAthleticNYC: Offseason acquisition Anton Tinnerholm was a huge part of NYCFC's 2-1 win in Sunday's home opener over the LA Galaxy. @… 1 week ago
  • Categories

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 73 other followers

  • Advertisements

The CBA: Strike on the Horizon?

The big business news in the world of American soccer is the announcement by the Players’ Union that  they have authorized a strike.  Reports indicate that the Union is planning to strike on the eve of “First Kick” if a new deal isn’t reached.  This provides the sides with a two week window to finalize a deal or face the the prospect of losing the nationally televised openers in Seattle and New York and full slate of opening week games.As these are pretty big showcase events for MLS, a strike could do real damage to the new season.

While the league has said that ticket sales haven’t suffered, there have been few announcement of new league partnerships, jerseys sponsors and other similar news in recent weeks.  Fans are wondering aloud about ticket refunds for games missed, journalists are discussing the possibility of players leaving MLS for foreign leagues during a strike and dozens of other questions remain unanswered.   There are no answers at this point; it is up to the parties and the mediator to make a deal.

Some say the players are holding the strike option for the most opportune time, and now we know that time.  Others thought that the players don’t have the votes or the will to strike but that has been disproven.  Others think that the threat of a strike can do real harm to the owners because it will slow the ability of teams to sign sponsors.  Regardless, we are now twp weeks from the season and there is no labor agreement and no labor peace…yet the games go on.  We will keep monitoring the situation, but for now….


3 Responses

  1. The players voted 383-2 for a strike is memory serves. They are unified. Impressive. Let’s hope the players union gets what they deserve.

  2. http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=754773&sec=mls&cc=5901

    The leaders of the player union aren’t trying to get free agency to go to another, bigger league (those players let their agents do the talking). The outspoken few are usually vets of the MLS or this is their last stop. What does Kasey Keller have to gain by going on strike? He is 40 and turned down a offer that would have doubled his current salary. They are not trying to get more money. They are trying to do what is right for there teammates and the future of the league.

    The players are unified and seemingly unwavering. If MLS is stupid enough not to give into the players relatively small demands then another league will.

    MLS isn’t the only league in the United States. They will cave (to reason) eventually.

    If MLS waits another week I will buy season tickets to the Aztecs (my local team). I will boycott MLS until they show their workforce (the players) the respect that they deserve.

  3. Why do you mean “deserve”.

    The players are unified in the press, but we don’t know what is going on behind the scenes.

    I would say that the “future of the league” is a two way street. Clearly the players and owners have different takes on what needs to happen to make that “future”

Comments are closed.