<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soccer Business Bits: ESPN Coverage, Revs Respond &amp; More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://footiebusiness.com/2009/12/04/soccer-business-bits-espn-coverage-revs-respond-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://footiebusiness.com/2009/12/04/soccer-business-bits-espn-coverage-revs-respond-more/</link>
	<description>Looking at the business side of the beautiful game</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:08:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: victory</title>
		<link>http://footiebusiness.com/2009/12/04/soccer-business-bits-espn-coverage-revs-respond-more/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[victory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiebusiness.com/?p=774#comment-823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should have recorded it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have recorded it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manutd</title>
		<link>http://footiebusiness.com/2009/12/04/soccer-business-bits-espn-coverage-revs-respond-more/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[manutd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiebusiness.com/?p=774#comment-822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overall, not bad coverage. I too like the addition of McManaman and Ekoku. I think the &quot;pre-draw&quot; coverage was a little drawn out, but I can&#039;t argue with more soccer on TV in any form.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall, not bad coverage. I too like the addition of McManaman and Ekoku. I think the &#8220;pre-draw&#8221; coverage was a little drawn out, but I can&#8217;t argue with more soccer on TV in any form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liggie</title>
		<link>http://footiebusiness.com/2009/12/04/soccer-business-bits-espn-coverage-revs-respond-more/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liggie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiebusiness.com/?p=774#comment-820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was surprised that ESPN was able to get Steve McManaman and Efan Ekoku.  They provided good perspectives and helped balance out Lalas&#039; excesses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was surprised that ESPN was able to get Steve McManaman and Efan Ekoku.  They provided good perspectives and helped balance out Lalas&#8217; excesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

