<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MLS:  A Peek Behind the Curtain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://footiebusiness.com/2009/03/26/mls-a-peek-behind-the-curtain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://footiebusiness.com/2009/03/26/mls-a-peek-behind-the-curtain/</link>
	<description>Looking at the business side of the beautiful game</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHORT CORNERS &#8211; SOCCER NEWS AND RUMORS &#171; Goodman Browne on the Pitch</title>
		<link>http://footiebusiness.com/2009/03/26/mls-a-peek-behind-the-curtain/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SHORT CORNERS &#8211; SOCCER NEWS AND RUMORS &#171; Goodman Browne on the Pitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiebusiness.com/?p=246#comment-1452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] MLS: A PEEK BEHIND THE CURTAIN (BEN BURGER-FOOTIEBUSINESS) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MLS: A PEEK BEHIND THE CURTAIN (BEN BURGER-FOOTIEBUSINESS) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://footiebusiness.com/2009/03/26/mls-a-peek-behind-the-curtain/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiebusiness.com/?p=246#comment-175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree about Portland.  based on Seattle, numbers should be much higher.  I thought the naming rights deals would be higher]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about Portland.  based on Seattle, numbers should be much higher.  I thought the naming rights deals would be higher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victory!</title>
		<link>http://footiebusiness.com/2009/03/26/mls-a-peek-behind-the-curtain/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Victory!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 02:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiebusiness.com/?p=246#comment-174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chivas numbers are alarmingly low, but the big increase league wide is encouraging.  Is that Beckham effect?

I think Portland will do much better than the report predicts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chivas numbers are alarmingly low, but the big increase league wide is encouraging.  Is that Beckham effect?</p>
<p>I think Portland will do much better than the report predicts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

